Photo Credit: Rediff.Com |
Manufacturing sector
was not in forefront during India’s economic policy reforms in 1991. Rather
India’s immense growth of 9 percent was largely driven by its service sector
(sharing 58% of GDP). IT and ITES popularly known as ‘sunshine sector’ has made
enormous contribution to India’s GDP growth and its skilled human capital has
received world-wise acclamation. It has truly transformed India’s economic image, helping to reshape its
conventional, traditional economy into a market driven, competitive ‘knowledge
economy’. This high-skill sector provides 25 lakhs jobs with
multiplier effect on future generation and has created a Nouveau
riche Class in India with very high purchasing power. But
such economic boom has neglected and sometimes marginalized many more lakhs in
semi-skill, low-skill and no-skill category, creating huge economic disparity
and a scenario of ‘jobless growth’. It is being argued by many scholars that
such a situation has emerged because India has almost skipped its second stage
of development, which ought to happen through industrialization and
manufacturing, and which alone could create mass employment to this large
section of population and could check such unmanageable disparity in the
economy. Country therefore with 61 percent of working population of 15-59
years, and with additional about 200 million to enter job market in next 15
years necessarily needs to create opportunities for employment and
entrepreneurship, mostly for semi-skilled and less-skilled workers. Sheer
neglect of manufacturing sector also has affected India’s merchandise trade
balance, and China whose manufacturing shares 34 percent of its GDP could
easily grab this space in the world market. India’s share of manufacturing
sector in GDP was stagnated at around 16 percent for last two decades.
Such rising challenges
have forced India to revisit its policy initiative for manufacturing sector.
The government has been stressing the needs to increase manufacturing
output on a number of occasions and in 2004, UPA I has set up a National
Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (NMCC) with the objective to suggest ways
to increase manufacturing competitiveness and to improve its share in GDP. Finally
in 2011, UPA II has managed to implement country’s much needed National
Manufacturing Policy. The policy vigorously envisages 25 percent share in
national GDP and creation of additional 100 million jobs by 2022. It was
initiated with an idea of having a robust
manufacturing sector that can help to create jobs in mass scale and be one of
strong pillars for economic growth in a sustainable way. The existing
manufacturing capacity in India is not optimum and is heavily dependent
on Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) which employs over 100 million
people in around 4 million units across the country and contributes 45 percent
to the total manufacturing output with 40 percent of country’s export. The
current interim budget 2014 has notified Public Procurement Policy to establish
technology and common facility centers and to launch Khadi-Mark, which is again
a policy step to promote further the MSME in India.
For expanding manufacturing
sector per se, India needs to
increase its supply chain through diversification, infrastructure management,
flexible labour law, transparency in land acquisition and collaborations at
various levels extending to multinationals. It is being argued that there
exists ample scope for the manufacturing sector to return to high growth
trajectory. The sharp depreciation of currency coupled with pick-up in growth
revival of global economies in recent months has beckoned optimism to Indian
manufacturing exporters. Thus sector like textile, petrochemicals can find more
space now. But most importantly the roadmap for manufacturing sector needs cautious
policy planning for a balanced growth with emphasis on various regions of the
country. Multiple manufacturing sectors along with diversity, more cross-regional
industrial corridors and region-specific endowments and interests needs to be
promoted, as the potentials of mountainous Northeast India cannot be the same
as coastal West of India. This can enhance productivity with more growth poles
in laggard region and can restrain undue concentration of industrial expansion in
advance regions, preventing another fresh challenge of core-periphery landscape
in Indian economy.
Notes
1.
Economy Matter, Volume 19, No. 1, 2014,
CII
2.
Economic Survey, 2012-13, GOI
3.
India’s Continuing Manufacturing
Drought, The Wall Street Journal, February 2014
Rakhee Bhattacharya
No comments:
Post a Comment